Liberal Logicliberals, leftists, progressives, socialists, Democrats, Marxists

Note:  Today’s “Liberals” are not the classic independent liberal who believed in small government and personal responsibility similar to today’s Libertarians – instead they are modern day big government big brother control everyone hard leftists, progressives, socialists, and some portion of Democrats.

Liberals believe that by age 18 (or younger) you are old enough to make your choice to have consensual s3x – but you’re never old enough to come to a consensual agreement with an employer about what you are willing to accept for a job salary; the government must set wages for you.

Liberals believe that they care about the children … but saddling them with trillions of dollars of debt to pay for my bloated leftist government is okay.

Liberals want government out of the bedroom, but want everyone else to pay for what they choose to do in that bedroom.

Liberals believe that everyone should be free to use marijuana because it has no harmful effects (never mind all the carcinogens in the smoke, brain effects, etc), but alcohol is a dangerous drug that should be outlawed because people might drive drunk or become alcoholics.

Liberals believe we must carpool to reduce pollution and use of non-renewable resources, but ridesharing might not be safe and must be outlawed, even when the drivers have commercial licenses, background checks, and are bonded, and their cars passed safety inspection.

Liberals believe that people who can’t accurately tell us if it will rain on Friday, can predict the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don’t start driving a Chevy Volt.

Liberals believe that women are never old enough to actually take care of themselves without government help (see “Life of Julia” courtesy Obama), but young teen girls are old enough to decide to have an abortion without their parents knowledge.

Liberals believe it’s immoral and horrific to waterboard a handful of the very worst terrorists, but it’s perfectly fine for our Nobel Peace Prize winning president to drop bombs on them remotely using drones, violating national sovereignty in the process,  and killing thousands — even though a quarter of the total deaths are completely innocent bystanders (not to mention a few U.S. citizens killed unconstitutionally without due process, including an innocent USA citizen who was a 16 year old boy).

Liberals believe it’s abhorrent to possibly disturb a few of the caribou in remote Alaska for oil, but it’s fine to fry massive numbers of birds, bats, and insects on the wing, slice and dice them, and explode them for wind and solar power around the nation.

Liberals believe it makes perfect sense to continue blaming Bush 60 months later, but it’s silly to talk about Benghazi, the murder of our Ambassador and other Americans, and the following Administration cover up a mere 20 months later.

Liberals believe it’s immoral to profess one’s intent to try to be moral, and fail, but it’s perfectly fine and not immoral to simply have no morals period, and to act immorally — just so long as you just never claim to have morals to begin with.

Liberals want to spend beaucoup money to get all children a great education; but they don’t want to permit vouchers that would empower parents to choose the best school for their children.

Liberals believe the supposed use of “dog whistles” or “micro-aggression” (even when entirely unintended) is so outrageously sinful and offensive that it totally justifies screaming vulgar obscenities and curse words, flinging accusations of racism, and all sorts of other things in response. But that all that blatant vulgarity, obscenities, curse words, and name calling isn’t offensive.

Liberals believe that very very hot weather proves anthropogenic global warming is occurring, but that very very cold weather is “simply weather, not climate, idjit.”

Liberals define free expression strictly in terms of sexuall behavior – abortion, gay marriage, contraceptives, etc. In contrast, they have become speech and thought fascists. It is now far a greater crime to use “forbidden” words than to kill an infant.

Liberals believe it is fine to stop the flow of water and impoverish the poorest among us, put farmers out of business they’ve run for many decades, increase food costs across the nation, all to “protect” a non-indigenous bait fish by flushing massive amounts of water out into the ocean rather than letting it be used for irrigation as it has been for many many decades.

Liberals believe requiring voter ID is discriminatory against minorities, but it’s perfectly fine to require the same ID for purchasing over the counter decongestants, entering all federal buildings, entering any court house, participating in a no-voter-ID rally, getting any federal benefits, having a savings or checking account, using a credit card or a check, buying any alcoholic beverage, participating at a Democratic Party National Convention, to board a NC NAACP bus to protest voter ID laws in NC, rent an apartment or buy a house, to buy a car, to get a library card, to get a post office box, to get a job, to open a bank account, to go to school, to get a credit card, to get a cell phone account, to get an internet provider, to get electric service, to get water service, to get car insurance, to get health insurance, to get home owners insurance, to get life insurance, to get tags for your dog, to buy beer and wine, to join a gym, to put something on lay-away at Wal-mart, to get a fishing or hunting license, to buy a gun, to get a carry permit, to get a permit to renovate your house, to register a business, to sell junk to a scrap yard, to sign up for welfare, to get food stamps, to cash a check, to rent a motel room… hell, at Disney world they require not only photo ID but also finger prints, etc., etc.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Polls Schmolls – There’s a Better Way to Predict Presidential Election Results

It’s the Economy, Stupid, says the University of Colorado

People have become increasingly skeptical and dissatisfied with major election polling — and with good reason.  All too often polls no longer seem to reflect demographic reality or eventual election results.  Recently several excellent articles have been written evaluating the pro’s and con’s of election polling and their questionable predictive ability.  These articles examine various relevant issues; accuracy, demographic sampling versus voter demographics or political party affiliation, national versus state versus local polls and how they relate, or the relative merits of one polling company’s proclamations versus another…  The media just adores this very contentious issue — reporting and debating the ‘horse race’ provides endless fodder for the front page.  However, while mucking around in the weeds, the forest is all too often ignored; for the most part, polls which have become extremely numerous over the years, have simply become far less accurate — or perhaps this is just surrendered as “something that goes without saying.”  Polls that do manage to accurately predict one election frequently fail to do so in other elections.

One might protest, “So what, polls are the best thing we have!”  Or “what else can we use?”  Well, it turns out that there actually may be a better way to predict presidential election results.  A rather obscure university model has proven to be far more reliable than public polling — or pretty much any other model.  Continue reading

Posted in Politics, Polls | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

America Knows that “Leading from Behind” Isn’t “Smart Power”

Some time ago the Obama administration introduced the world to a new policy doctrine branded “Leading from Behind.” It’s unclear exactly what is meant by this seemingly contradictory phrase. Perhaps it was intended to illustrate gentle, bipartisan, but firm leadership as the Chief Executive. Perhaps to show that the United States is just one nation among many — not exceptional — with the same voice as any other nation no matter size, government structure, or human rights record. Maybe the idea is that a humble attitude would result in our being more liked. Leading from Behind was coupled with the idea of “Smart Power,” which apparently means wielding our nation’s might like a scalpel; limited, judiciously, in accordance with other nation’s wishes — we’ll go along to get along, so to speak.

Regardless, all Obama seems to manage to do is lead from behind. He has a real penchant for it, demonstrating this time and again in Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ode to Obama – or how we know what isn’t so

It seems that Obama, with or without a teleprompter, just can’t quite cut it — at least not without the mainstream media (MSM) covering for him.  I’ve been trying to follow along and keep the story straight, but that can be difficult.  Let me see if I can lay it all out for you.

First, I am still looking for the other 10 states that Obama said we had; “I’ve now been in 57 states?  I think one left to go. Alaska and Hawaii, I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit, but my staff would not justify it…” Continue reading

Posted in Politics | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments

Uninstalling The Obama Trojan

In 2009, America installed the Obama program.  Unfortunately, it seems to have major programming flaws or is malware.  Problems encountered include Obamanomics, Obamacare, Obamageddon, deactivation of Constitution, Blame Bush, Indefinite Detention (American Citizen version), deactivation of Rights to Due Process, deactivation of Foreign Nation Sovereignty, Commie-unity, denigration of Office of the President, Obamanation, Obamalies, Obamarrhoids, Ovaricator, Obamarrhea, Baracknaphobia, and other problems.

Fortunately there is a simple solution: Continue reading

Posted in Humor | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments